Which of the following is NOT a goal of prescribed fire management?

The identification of killing ticks and snakes as not a goal of prescribed fire management is accurate. Prescribed fire management primarily focuses on ecological and land management goals that benefit the landscape and its inhabitants.

Hazardous fuel reduction is a critical objective, as it involves using controlled burns to decrease the buildup of flammable materials in forests and grasslands, thereby reducing the risk of wildfires. Improved wildlife habitat is another vital goal, as fire can help rejuvenate ecosystems by promoting the growth of certain plants that provide food and shelter for wildlife. Additionally, prescribed fires can be instrumental in reducing competition from unwanted species, allowing preferred plants to thrive and thereby supporting biodiversity in the ecosystem.

Killing ticks and snakes is not a recognized objective of prescribed fire management. While fire may have some incidental impact on these species, it is not specifically aimed at their population control or eradication. The intended benefits of prescribed fire are much broader and tied to ecosystem health rather than targeting specific animal populations.